<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calif. City Switches to Verified Alarms Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.911dispatch.com/2012/01/27/calif-city-switches-to-verified-alarms-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2012/01/27/calif-city-switches-to-verified-alarms-only/</link>
	<description>news and information about public safety communications since 1982</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geek</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2012/01/27/calif-city-switches-to-verified-alarms-only/comment-page-1/#comment-26282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=6130#comment-26282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Burglars, this podunk town&#039;s police department no longer responds to in progress burglary alarm calls. How giving notice like that could NOT cause an increase in property crimes I don&#039;t know. 

Here&#039;s the thing - when you stop responding on calls like audible burglar alarms, alarm companies will then claim it&#039;s a silent alarm or hold up or some other alarm that meets your response criteria. 

Similarly, neighbors will call anonymously and claim they saw somebody breaking in, when in fact they&#039;re just griping about the noise. 

Policies like this one are just asking for trouble. 

Ask the Stockton, CA police department. They had a &quot;non response&quot; list for alarms that frequently cried wolf. Guess what? The bad guys had access to that list. So when an alarm company calls in a hold up alarm at a liquor store and the police don&#039;t respond (only to find two dead employees inside a few hours later) tell me how this policy is working to protect the public again? 

I don&#039;t get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Burglars, this podunk town&#8217;s police department no longer responds to in progress burglary alarm calls. How giving notice like that could NOT cause an increase in property crimes I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; when you stop responding on calls like audible burglar alarms, alarm companies will then claim it&#8217;s a silent alarm or hold up or some other alarm that meets your response criteria. </p>
<p>Similarly, neighbors will call anonymously and claim they saw somebody breaking in, when in fact they&#8217;re just griping about the noise. </p>
<p>Policies like this one are just asking for trouble. </p>
<p>Ask the Stockton, CA police department. They had a &#8220;non response&#8221; list for alarms that frequently cried wolf. Guess what? The bad guys had access to that list. So when an alarm company calls in a hold up alarm at a liquor store and the police don&#8217;t respond (only to find two dead employees inside a few hours later) tell me how this policy is working to protect the public again? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imnotrich</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2012/01/27/calif-city-switches-to-verified-alarms-only/comment-page-1/#comment-26281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imnotrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=6130#comment-26281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Burglars, this podunk town&#039;s police department no longer responds to in progress burglary alarm calls. How giving notice like that could NOT cause an increase in property crimes I don&#039;t know. 

Here&#039;s the thing - when you stop responding on calls like audible burglar alarms, alarm companies will then claim it&#039;s a silent alarm or hold up or some other alarm that meets your response criteria. 

Similarly, neighbors will call anonymously and claim they saw somebody breaking in, when in fact they&#039;re just griping about the noise. 

Policies like this one are just asking for trouble. 

Ask the Stockton, CA police department. They had a &quot;non response&quot; list for alarms that frequently cried wolf. Guess what? The bad guys had access to that list. So when an alarm company calls in a hold up alarm at a liquor store and the police don&#039;t respond (only to find two dead employees inside a few hours later) tell me how this policy is working to protect the public again? 

I don&#039;t get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Burglars, this podunk town&#8217;s police department no longer responds to in progress burglary alarm calls. How giving notice like that could NOT cause an increase in property crimes I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; when you stop responding on calls like audible burglar alarms, alarm companies will then claim it&#8217;s a silent alarm or hold up or some other alarm that meets your response criteria. </p>
<p>Similarly, neighbors will call anonymously and claim they saw somebody breaking in, when in fact they&#8217;re just griping about the noise. </p>
<p>Policies like this one are just asking for trouble. </p>
<p>Ask the Stockton, CA police department. They had a &#8220;non response&#8221; list for alarms that frequently cried wolf. Guess what? The bad guys had access to that list. So when an alarm company calls in a hold up alarm at a liquor store and the police don&#8217;t respond (only to find two dead employees inside a few hours later) tell me how this policy is working to protect the public again? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
