<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Warn of Smartphone Scanner Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/</link>
	<description>news and information about public safety communications since 1982</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-131254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-131254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.broadcastify.com/listen/ctid/183]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.broadcastify.com/listen/ctid/183" rel="nofollow">http://www.broadcastify.com/listen/ctid/183</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-131252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-131252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t necessarily see the problem.

Those scanner apps are receiving the feeds from a website and, because of that, there is a significant delay. Not only that, but most major departments are using more than one channel and most feeds on those apps consist of all channels being run at one time. Those scanner apps--as to my knowledge--do not allow you to lock onto one channel for the &quot;gangsta&#039;s&quot; to monitor as they&#039;re committing their crimes. The gangsters may miss the anonymous reporting person observing them steal someone&#039;s cash because &quot;OPD Service channel&quot; (Just makin&#039; that one up) is active with an officer running a DL, making it unable for you to lockout the service channel so you can hear the dispatcher sending the call on the main dispatch channel. The main reason why I eventually bought an actual police scanner was because I was missing calls in my area because other channels that the feed on my app consisted of  more active channels.
Another reason not to use a police scanner to a commit a crime (in the state of CA):
CA Penal Code 636.5--Prohibits the use of a scanner during a crime.
[http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily see the problem.</p>
<p>Those scanner apps are receiving the feeds from a website and, because of that, there is a significant delay. Not only that, but most major departments are using more than one channel and most feeds on those apps consist of all channels being run at one time. Those scanner apps&#8211;as to my knowledge&#8211;do not allow you to lock onto one channel for the &#8220;gangsta&#8217;s&#8221; to monitor as they&#8217;re committing their crimes. The gangsters may miss the anonymous reporting person observing them steal someone&#8217;s cash because &#8220;OPD Service channel&#8221; (Just makin&#8217; that one up) is active with an officer running a DL, making it unable for you to lockout the service channel so you can hear the dispatcher sending the call on the main dispatch channel. The main reason why I eventually bought an actual police scanner was because I was missing calls in my area because other channels that the feed on my app consisted of  more active channels.<br />
Another reason not to use a police scanner to a commit a crime (in the state of CA):<br />
CA Penal Code 636.5&#8211;Prohibits the use of a scanner during a crime.<br />
[http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-103177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-103177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The police work for the people. Their radio transmissions as a peacekeeping force must be public information IMO.

If the police forces want their channels secured, then why not use some of the unbelievable defense budgeting to by them some SINGCARS radios, which are secure, and easily transmit over a city, and easily network over a county, using frequency hop, etc.

Oh yeah, I forgot, we dont have a defense budget anymore because we spent it all on a useless war, (which I fought in).

Also, its too much work. Its much better to just pass a bill that bans open source applications for cell phones, which does nothing about protecting and serving the public.

Like it was said earlier, obtain a warrant to IP trace and use GPS location hardware to find known fugitives/criminals.

Its not the best solution... But, we already live with big brother anyway. If they are going to do it anyway, then get it over with already. All of this lobbying and politics behind the scenes is a load of crap anyway, and the public no longer has any confidence in our government anyway. Public relations is a waste of money now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police work for the people. Their radio transmissions as a peacekeeping force must be public information IMO.</p>
<p>If the police forces want their channels secured, then why not use some of the unbelievable defense budgeting to by them some SINGCARS radios, which are secure, and easily transmit over a city, and easily network over a county, using frequency hop, etc.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I forgot, we dont have a defense budget anymore because we spent it all on a useless war, (which I fought in).</p>
<p>Also, its too much work. Its much better to just pass a bill that bans open source applications for cell phones, which does nothing about protecting and serving the public.</p>
<p>Like it was said earlier, obtain a warrant to IP trace and use GPS location hardware to find known fugitives/criminals.</p>
<p>Its not the best solution&#8230; But, we already live with big brother anyway. If they are going to do it anyway, then get it over with already. All of this lobbying and politics behind the scenes is a load of crap anyway, and the public no longer has any confidence in our government anyway. Public relations is a waste of money now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-86248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-86248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Communications Act of 1934 allows private citizens to own and operate radio receivers. To use the information obtained therein for criminal acts, however, is a violation of US Title Code and subjects the violator to possible federal prosecution. In other words, its OK to listen but not OK to use the information to escape authorities or commit crimes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Communications Act of 1934 allows private citizens to own and operate radio receivers. To use the information obtained therein for criminal acts, however, is a violation of US Title Code and subjects the violator to possible federal prosecution. In other words, its OK to listen but not OK to use the information to escape authorities or commit crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandi</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-26295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-26295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this app on my phone it&#039;s not illegal it&#039;s on our phone for safety n I love it lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this app on my phone it&#8217;s not illegal it&#8217;s on our phone for safety n I love it lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sensitive transmissions should not be in the clear, to begin with.
Since scanners are legal, so are scanner feeds to Smartphones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensitive transmissions should not be in the clear, to begin with.<br />
Since scanners are legal, so are scanner feeds to Smartphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oakland Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oakland Resident]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have the link to the Oakland Police Scanner feed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have the link to the Oakland Police Scanner feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the criminal has a phone, even a plain one, someone back home with a scanner could relay the info by phone.

Here is a different one.
Posted 6/16/2010

Chesterton Tribune                                                                                 

Man charged with unlawful use of a police radio

A homeless man was arrested Tuesday on charges of unlawful use of a police radio and false reporting, Portage Police said. 

Indiana Code 35-44-3-12 forbids a person from possessing a police radio unless specifically authorized to do so. Exceptions include law enforcement officers, a public service or utility company, those with amateur radio licenses issued by the FCC, a member of the news media, or a person “who uses a police radio only in the person’s dwelling or place of business.” 
http://www.chestertontribune.com/PoliceFireEmergency/man_charged_with_unlawful_use_of.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the criminal has a phone, even a plain one, someone back home with a scanner could relay the info by phone.</p>
<p>Here is a different one.<br />
Posted 6/16/2010</p>
<p>Chesterton Tribune                                                                                 </p>
<p>Man charged with unlawful use of a police radio</p>
<p>A homeless man was arrested Tuesday on charges of unlawful use of a police radio and false reporting, Portage Police said. </p>
<p>Indiana Code 35-44-3-12 forbids a person from possessing a police radio unless specifically authorized to do so. Exceptions include law enforcement officers, a public service or utility company, those with amateur radio licenses issued by the FCC, a member of the news media, or a person “who uses a police radio only in the person’s dwelling or place of business.”<br />
<a href="http://www.chestertontribune.com/PoliceFireEmergency/man_charged_with_unlawful_use_of.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.chestertontribune.com/PoliceFireEmergency/man_charged_with_unlawful_use_of.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FedFyrGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FedFyrGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Police are that worried about their communications being intercepted:
--Promote legislation to make reception illegal as has been done with monitoring cellular phones.
--Use encryption.
--Switch to a system that cannot be currently monitored.

&quot;The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.&quot; --H. L. Mencken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Police are that worried about their communications being intercepted:<br />
&#8211;Promote legislation to make reception illegal as has been done with monitoring cellular phones.<br />
&#8211;Use encryption.<br />
&#8211;Switch to a system that cannot be currently monitored.</p>
<p>&#8220;The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.&#8221; &#8211;H. L. Mencken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.911dispatch.com/2010/06/07/police-warn-of-smartphone-scanner-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold Eastman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911dispatch.com/?p=3339#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he were smart, he would have kept his mouth shut instead of &quot;warning&quot; and gotten warrants to track the gang members through the cellular telephone companies&#039; locational technology. The better title here is &quot;Dispatch Magazine Warns of Technologically Impaired Police Chief.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he were smart, he would have kept his mouth shut instead of &#8220;warning&#8221; and gotten warrants to track the gang members through the cellular telephone companies&#8217; locational technology. The better title here is &#8220;Dispatch Magazine Warns of Technologically Impaired Police Chief.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
